University Of California: ‘It’s Time To Accept Jesus Was A Black Man’

University Of California: ‘It’s Time To Accept Jesus Was A Black Man’

November 11, 2019 0 By Stanley Isaacs


Scientists have attempted to recreate the
face of Jesus of Nazareth through forensic anthropology and the results bear little resemblance
to the blonde, blue-eyed version of Jesus accepted by most Americans. According to the
University of California, it is time to accept the idea that Jesus was black. In the end, it doesn’t even matter, whether
Jesus of Nazareth was white or black. However, speaking in a historical context, maybe its
time to ask what was Jesus Christ really like? What color was his skin? Why is Jesus depicted
as a having long hair, a beard and of white skin? Was Jesus’ representation always like
that? Or did it change throughout time? The answer may surprise you. Most Historians and Biblical scholars firmly
agree that Jesus of Nazareth, born in what is today the capital and the largest city
in the Northern District of Israel. In the New Testament, the town is described as the
childhood home of Jesus, and as such is a center of Christian pilgrimage, with many
shrines commemorating biblical events. Ancient Code reports: This historical fact
may shed light on the appearance of Jesus of Nazareth. Is it possible that he had a
Middle Eastern Appearance? Despite His most likely middle-eastern appearance,
it has been proven controversial among many experts who argue that Jesus was a white man. In historical records, we find only a few
description of Bible, and those that exist look more towards his divinity and Power,
rather than accurately describing his ‘mortal’ appearance. So, how can we know what Jesus looked like? Most experts agree that in order to understand
what Jesus might have looked like we should turn towards the area where He was born. It is believed that the ancient Jews looked
very similar to their Middle-Eastern neighbors, being characterized by having dark skin and
hair. Interestingly, many of the earliest representations
of Christ are illustrated in this way, where the artist emphasized on Jesus Christ’s
Semitic origins. However, through the years this changed and
the way Jesus was illustrated changed drastically. Science takes a look Richard Neave, a scientist at the University
of Manchester, has spent a good part of his time trying to reconstruct the face of Jesus
of Nazareth through forensic anthropology, one of the subdisciplines of physical anthropology. It is not the first time that the professor
has done a job of this kind, he had previously reconstructed the face of other very popular
historical figures, such as Philip II of Macedonia (father of Alexander the Great) and King Midas. To make an image of Jesus more adapted to
reality, the scientist counted on three well-preserved first-century skulls that had been found in
Israel. From them, Neave used the computerized tomography to try to obtain even the smallest
detail. We are used to seeing representations of Jesus
of Nazareth that show him with chestnut hair, white skin, light eyes and a beard. But science now questions that very Caucasian
aspect and claims that His skin color was black, He had a larger nose and also, a much
more corpulent appearance. As explained in Popular Mechanics, scientists
believe that this recreation of Jesus could be the most accurate that has been done to
date. According to Alison Galloway, professor of
anthropology at the University of California, “it is probably truer to reality than the
work of many great masters of painting.” So, if we know that Jesus was not white, why
are we still depicting Him as a white man, brown hair, and a beard? When Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity,
and the religion spread across the Roman Empire, the classic representation of Jesus of Nazareth
began to change. Roman artists started depicting Jesus with
long brown hair, with a beard, and white, only to emphasize His connection with the
people of the Roman Empire and Europe. Over the centuries this trend would spread across
the continent, and the world, where Jesus was depicted as looking more like a Central
European man, than someone born in Nazareth.