Did former American University student accused of espionage have ties to Trump?

Did former American University student accused of espionage have ties to Trump?

August 27, 2019 1 By Stanley Isaacs


GO GO TO GO TO WUSA9.COM. GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected] GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE KNOW GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE KNOW YOU GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE KNOW YOU ARE GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON GO TO WUSA9.COM. [email protected]
>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT OVERLOAD,>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE IS>>WE KNOW YOU ARE ON THE
REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE IS A REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE IS A REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE IS A
NEW REPORT OVERLOAD, BUT THERE IS A
NEW TWIST. NEW TWIST. NEW TWIST.
WE NEW TWIST.
WE ARE NEW TWIST.
WE ARE TALKING NEW TWIST.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NEW TWIST.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT [email protected] WE ARE TALKING ABOUT [email protected] WE ARE TALKING ABOUT [email protected]
AGENT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT [email protected]
AGENT MARIA. AGENT MARIA. AGENT MARIA.
SHE AGENT MARIA.
SHE MAY AGENT MARIA.
SHE MAY BE AGENT MARIA.
SHE MAY BE [email protected] AGENT MARIA.
SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AGENT MARIA.
SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY STUDENT, SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE SHE MAY BE [email protected] FORMER AMERICAN
UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected] UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected] UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected]
MIGHT UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected]
MIGHT HAVE UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected]
MIGHT HAVE BEEN UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected]
MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE UNIVERSITY STUDENT, BUT SHE [email protected]
MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS. MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS. MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS.
DID MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS.
DID SHE MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS.
DID SHE HAVE MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS.
DID SHE HAVE A MIGHT HAVE BEEN MORE DANGEROUS.
DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT
CONNECTION DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT
CONNECTION TO DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT
CONNECTION TO PRESIDENT DID SHE HAVE A DIRECT
CONNECTION TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S CONNECTION TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S CONNECTION TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S
INNER CONNECTION TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S
INNER CIRCLE? INNER CIRCLE? INNER CIRCLE?
MICHAEL INNER CIRCLE?
MICHAEL HAS INNER CIRCLE?
MICHAEL HAS THAT INNER CIRCLE?
MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE. MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE. MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>Reporter: MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>Reporter: IT MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>Reporter: IT IS MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>Reporter: IT IS A MICHAEL HAS THAT UPDATE.
>>Reporter: IT IS A BOMBSHELL>>Reporter: IT IS A BOMBSHELL>>Reporter: IT IS A BOMBSHELL
SHROUDED>>Reporter: IT IS A BOMBSHELL
SHROUDED IN>>Reporter: IT IS A BOMBSHELL
SHROUDED IN SECRECY. SHROUDED IN SECRECY. SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID MARIA SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID MARIA HAVE SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES CLOSE SHROUDED IN SECRECY.
DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES CLOSE TO DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES CLOSE TO DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES CLOSE TO
PRESIDENT DID MARIA HAVE SOURCES CLOSE TO
PRESIDENT TRUMP? PRESIDENT TRUMP? PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT WAS PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT WAS JUST PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT WAS JUST AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT WAS JUST AFTER THE PRESIDENT TRUMP?
IT WAS JUST AFTER THE ELECTION IT WAS JUST AFTER THE ELECTION IT WAS JUST AFTER THE ELECTION
IN IT WAS JUST AFTER THE ELECTION
IN NOVEMBER IT WAS JUST AFTER THE ELECTION
IN NOVEMBER 2016. IN NOVEMBER 2016. IN NOVEMBER 2016.
IN IN NOVEMBER 2016.
IN A IN NOVEMBER 2016.
IN A NEW IN NOVEMBER 2016.
IN A NEW COURT IN NOVEMBER 2016.
IN A NEW COURT FILING, IN A NEW COURT FILING, IN A NEW COURT FILING,
[email protected] IN A NEW COURT FILING,
[email protected] WROTE IN A NEW COURT FILING,
[email protected] WROTE THAT IN A NEW COURT FILING,
[email protected] WROTE THAT SHE [email protected] WROTE THAT SHE [email protected] WROTE THAT SHE
PROVIDED [email protected] WROTE THAT SHE
PROVIDED A [email protected] WROTE THAT SHE
PROVIDED A RUSSIAN [email protected] WROTE THAT SHE
PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH THE PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH THE NAME PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH THE NAME OF PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] PROVIDED A RUSSIAN OFFICIAL
WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL
SECRETARY WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL
SECRETARY OF WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL
SECRETARY OF STATE WITH THE NAME OF [email protected] POTENTIAL
SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE. SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE. SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE.
SHE SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE.
SHE ASKED SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE.
SHE ASKED FOR SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE.
SHE ASKED FOR RUSSIAN SHE ASKED FOR RUSSIAN SHE ASKED FOR RUSSIAN
GOVERNMENT SHE ASKED FOR RUSSIAN
GOVERNMENT INPUT. GOVERNMENT INPUT. GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE SAID GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE SAID HER GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE SAID HER OPINION GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD GOVERNMENT INPUT.
SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD BE SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD BE SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD BE
CONSIDERED, SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD BE
CONSIDERED, BUT SHE SAID HER OPINION WOULD BE
CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE NO CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE NO FURTHER CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON CONSIDERED, BUT PROSECUTORS
GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER
CLAIMS.>>GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER
CLAIMS.>>IM GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER
CLAIMS.>>IM A GAVE NO FURTHER DETAILS ON HER
CLAIMS.>>IM A REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS.>>IM A REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS.>>IM A REPRESENTATIVE
OF CLAIMS.>>IM A REPRESENTATIVE
OF RUSSIA. OF RUSSIA. OF RUSSIA.
>>OF RUSSIA.
>>SHE OF RUSSIA.
>>SHE TOOK OF RUSSIA.
>>SHE TOOK STEPS OF RUSSIA.
>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO OF RUSSIA.
>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP
RELATIONSHIPS>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP
RELATIONSHIPS WITH>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP
RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS>>SHE TOOK STEPS TO DEVELOP
RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN
ORDER RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN
ORDER TO RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN
ORDER TO ADVANCE RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN
ORDER TO ADVANCE THE RELATIONSHIPS WITH AMERICANS IN
ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS
OF ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS
OF THE ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS
OF THE RUSSIAN ORDER TO ADVANCE THE INTERESTS
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE WAS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE WAS ARRESTED OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE WAS ARRESTED IN OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO
MONTHS SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO
MONTHS AFTER SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO
MONTHS AFTER GRADUATING SHE WAS ARRESTED IN JULY, TWO
MONTHS AFTER GRADUATING FROM MONTHS AFTER GRADUATING FROM MONTHS AFTER GRADUATING FROM
AMERICAN MONTHS AFTER GRADUATING FROM
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
[email protected] AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
RUSSIAN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
RUSSIAN PRESIDENT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE HAD RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE HAD NO RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE HAD NO [email protected] RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN SAID
SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED
GUILTY SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED
GUILTY TO SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED
GUILTY TO ACTING SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED
GUILTY TO ACTING AS SHE HAD NO [email protected] SHE PLEADED
GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN
UNREGISTERED GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN
UNREGISTERED FOREIGN GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN
UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT GUILTY TO ACTING AS AN
UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT OF UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT OF UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT OF
THE UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT OF
THE RUSSIAN UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT OF
THE RUSSIAN STATE. THE RUSSIAN STATE. THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER SENTENCING THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER SENTENCING IS THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER SENTENCING IS SET THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THE RUSSIAN STATE.
HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THIS HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THIS HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THIS
FRIDAY HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THIS
FRIDAY WITH HER SENTENCING IS SET FOR THIS
FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN
AUTHORITIES FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN
AUTHORITIES ASKING FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN
AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN
AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A FRIDAY WITH AMERICAN
AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM OF AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM OF NO AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM OF NO LESS AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM OF NO LESS THAN AUTHORITIES ASKING FOR A PRISON
TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18 TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18 TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18
MONTHS.>>TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18
MONTHS.>>AS TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18
MONTHS.>>AS FOR TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18
MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER TERM OF NO LESS THAN 18
MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER LAWYERS, MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER LAWYERS, MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER LAWYERS,
THEY MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER LAWYERS,
THEY WANT MONTHS.>>AS FOR HER LAWYERS,
THEY WANT HER